| Title |
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.060870 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiliang Liu, Robert M Liston, K S Joseph, Maureen Heaman, Reg Sauve, Michael S Kramer |
| Abstract |
The rate of elective primary cesarean delivery continues to rise, owing in part to the widespread perception that the procedure is of little or no risk to healthy women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 25 | 36% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 592 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 14% |
| Researcher | 69 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 8% |
| Other | 114 | 19% |
| Unknown | 148 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 270 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 61 | 10% |
| Unknown | 174 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#209,221
of 25,247,212 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#380
of 9,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#419
of 172,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.