You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasma proteins predict conversion to dementia from prodromal disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1749 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdul Hye, Joanna Riddoch‐Contreras, Alison L. Baird, Nicholas J. Ashton, Chantal Bazenet, Rufina Leung, Eric Westman, Andrew Simmons, Richard Dobson, Martina Sattlecker, Michelle Lupton, Katie Lunnon, Aoife Keohane, Malcolm Ward, Ian Pike, Hans Dieter Zucht, Danielle Pepin, Wei Zheng, Alan Tunnicliffe, Jill Richardson, Serge Gauthier, Hilkka Soininen, Iwona Kłoszewska, Patrizia Mecocci, Magda Tsolaki, Bruno Vellas, Simon Lovestone |
| Abstract |
The study aimed to validate previously discovered plasma biomarkers associated with AD, using a design based on imaging measures as surrogate for disease severity and assess their prognostic value in predicting conversion to dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 39% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 61% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 380 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 92 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 53 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 9% |
| Psychology | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#219,905
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#132
of 4,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,702
of 240,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: the Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
#4
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.