↓ Skip to main content

Microperimetry as a routine diagnostic test in the follow-up of retinal vein occlusion?

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Microperimetry as a routine diagnostic test in the follow-up of retinal vein occlusion?
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00417-011-1784-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sibylle Winterhalter, Anja Lux, Anna Karina Maier, Clara Scholz, Florian M. A. Heußen, Klaudia K. Huber, Antonia M. Joussen

Abstract

In the follow-up of retinal vein occlusions, a patient's subjective change in vision frequently cannot be confirmed by objective measurements. Furthermore, contradictory results of OCT and distance visual acuity give the impression that current routine diagnostic tests might not be satisfying for patients with retinal vein occlusions. This prospective case series analyses the value of microperimetry as a routine diagnostic test in the follow-up of patients with retinal vein occlusions during therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 9%
United Kingdom 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Psychology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%