↓ Skip to main content

The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load
Published in
NeuroImage, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana A. Zekveld, Dirk J. Heslenfeld, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Niek J. Versfeld, Sophia E. Kramer

Abstract

An important aspect of hearing is the degree to which listeners have to deploy effort to understand speech. One promising measure of listening effort is task-evoked pupil dilation. Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify the neural correlates of pupil dilation during comprehension of degraded spoken sentences in 17 normal-hearing listeners. Subjects listened to sentences degraded in three different ways: the target female speech was masked by fluctuating noise, by speech from a single male speaker, or the target speech was noise-vocoded. The degree of degradation was individually adapted such that 50% or 84% of the sentences were intelligible. Control conditions included clear speech in quiet, and silent trials. The peak pupil dilation was larger for the 50% compared to the 84% intelligibility condition, and largest for speech masked by the single-talker masker, followed by speech masked by fluctuating noise, and smallest for noise-vocoded speech. Activation in the bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG) showed the same pattern, with most extensive activation for speech masked by the single-talker masker. Larger peak pupil dilation was associated with more activation in the bilateral STG, bilateral ventral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and several frontal brain areas. A subset of the temporal region sensitive to pupil dilation was also sensitive to speech intelligibility and degradation type. These results show that pupil dilation during speech perception in challenging conditions reflects both auditory and cognitive processes that are recruited to cope with degraded speech and the need to segregate target speech from interfering sounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 278 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 28%
Researcher 50 17%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 39 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 29%
Neuroscience 36 12%
Linguistics 25 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 7%
Engineering 17 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 56 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,246,165
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#2,781
of 12,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,296
of 242,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#23
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.