↓ Skip to main content

Multiple factors determine the effect of anthropogenic barriers to connectivity on riverine fish

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Multiple factors determine the effect of anthropogenic barriers to connectivity on riverine fish
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0715-5
Authors

Robert J. Rolls, Ben Stewart-Koster, Tanya Ellison, Stephen Faggotter, David T. Roberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 37%
Environmental Science 28 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,845,823
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,102
of 2,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,903
of 232,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.