You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
緊急手術を要した複数個の磁石玩具誤飲の2例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11164/jjsps.52.1_102 |
| Authors |
亀井 尚美, 赤峰 翔, 大津 一弘 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 121 | 31% |
| Austria | 3 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 2 | <1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 259 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 389 | 100% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#249,486
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons
#1
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,278
of 313,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them