↓ Skip to main content

A database and synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and nitrogen accumulation

Overview of attention for article published in The Holocene, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A database and synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and nitrogen accumulation
Published in
The Holocene, July 2014
DOI 10.1177/0959683614538073
Authors

Julie Loisel, Zicheng Yu, David W Beilman, Philip Camill, Jukka Alm, Matthew J Amesbury, David Anderson, Sofia Andersson, Christopher Bochicchio, Keith Barber, Lisa R Belyea, Joan Bunbury, Frank M Chambers, Daniel J Charman, François De Vleeschouwer, Barbara Fiałkiewicz-Kozieł, Sarah A Finkelstein, Mariusz Gałka, Michelle Garneau, Dan Hammarlund, William Hinchcliffe, James Holmquist, Paul Hughes, Miriam C Jones, Eric S Klein, Ulla Kokfelt, Atte Korhola, Peter Kuhry, Alexandre Lamarre, Mariusz Lamentowicz, David Large, Martin Lavoie, Glen MacDonald, Gabriel Magnan, Markku Mäkilä, Gunnar Mallon, Paul Mathijssen, Dmitri Mauquoy, Julia McCarroll, Tim R Moore, Jonathan Nichols, Benjamin O’Reilly, Pirita Oksanen, Maara Packalen, Dorothy Peteet, Pierre JH Richard, Stephen Robinson, Tiina Ronkainen, Mats Rundgren, A Britta K Sannel, Charles Tarnocai, Tim Thom, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Merritt Turetsky, Minna Väliranta, Marjolein van der Linden, Bas van Geel, Simon van Bellen, Dale Vitt, Yan Zhao, Weijian Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 353 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 23%
Student > Master 55 15%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 88 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 122 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 69 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Engineering 3 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 102 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Holocene
#584
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,420
of 244,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Holocene
#10
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.