| Title |
Fluorescence diagnosis of endometriosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004640000160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Malik, C. Berg, A. Meyhöfer-Malik, O. Buchweitz, P. Moubayed, K. Diedrich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 53% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,750,902
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#813
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,709
of 228,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#17
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.