↓ Skip to main content

Effect of intragastric versus small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition on the incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients: a complementary meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Effect of intragastric versus small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition on the incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients: a complementary meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wan-Jie Gu, Jing-Chen Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,723,043
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,369
of 6,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,153
of 225,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#73
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.