↓ Skip to main content

Displacement of a landslide retaining wall and application of an enhanced failure forecasting approach

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Displacement of a landslide retaining wall and application of an enhanced failure forecasting approach
Published in
Landslides, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10346-017-0887-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommaso Carlà, Renato Macciotta, Michael Hendry, Derek Martin, Tom Edwards, Trevor Evans, Paolo Farina, Emanuele Intrieri, Nicola Casagli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 20%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,446,373
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#468
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,647
of 315,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.