↓ Skip to main content

Vestibulo-ocular reflex deficits with medial longitudinal fasciculus lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Vestibulo-ocular reflex deficits with medial longitudinal fasciculus lesions
Published in
Journal of Neurology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00415-017-8607-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swee T. Aw, Luke Chen, Michael J. Todd, Michael H. Barnett, G. Michael Halmagyi

Abstract

The medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) is the final common pathway for all conjugate adducting horizontal eye movements, as well as for the vertical-torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). MLF lesion causes adduction paresis of ipsilesional (adducting) eye with dissociated nystagmus of contralesional (abducting) eye-the well-known clinical syndrome of internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO). We measured the VOR stimulation and also any catch-up saccades, from individual semicircular canal (SCC) evoked by the head impulse test (HIT), using head and binocular 3-dimensional scleral search coils in 27 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, 8 with unilateral, 19 with bilateral INO. In unilateral INO, VOR gain (normal >0.90) from ipsilesional lateral SCC stimulation was 0.48 for the adducting eye and 0.81 for the abducting eye; 0.61 from contralesional anterior SCC stimulation and only 0.29 from contralesional posterior SCC stimulation. In bilateral INO, there were VOR gain deficits from all six SCCs: lateral SCC gains were asymmetrically reduced to 0.45 in the adducting eye and 0.66 in the abducting eye; anterior SCC gain was 0.48 and posterior SCC gain was only 0.19. Horizontal VOR versional dysconjugacy between adducting and abducting eyes at 0.66 was less severe than horizontal catch-up saccade versional dysconjugacy (0.44); normal >0.80. Unexpected partial preservation of horizontal VOR with greater catch-up saccade impairment from the adducting than abducting eye suggests that the ascending tract of Deiters (ATD), an extra-MLF pathway, also mediates the horizontal VOR, but not adducting horizontal saccades. Vertical VOR deficits will produce vertical oscillopsia with any vertical head movement and measurement of the vertical VOR could help with the diagnosis and quantitative evaluation of MLF lesions in suspected MS. Horizontal VOR deficits and catch-up saccade versional dysconjugacy in INO will cause gaze instability and horizontal oscillopsia during active horizontal head movements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,363,636
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,035
of 4,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,482
of 315,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.