↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Predictors of Malignancy in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Predictors of Malignancy in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-6074-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mashaal Dhir, Wei Li, Melissa E. Hogg, David L. Bartlett, Sally E. Carty, Kelly L. McCoy, Sue M. Challinor, Linwah Yip

Abstract

Factors associated with malignancy in patients with pheochromocytoma (adrenal tumors, Pheo) and paraganglioma (extra-adrenal, PGL) are not well-defined and all patients require lifelong surveillance. The primary aim of our study was to determine genetic and clinical variables associated with malignancy in patients with Pheo/PGL. Single institution retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent surgery (1/95-1/15) for Pheo/PGL. Malignancy was defined as histology-confirmed distant metastasis, lymph nodal involvement, or tumor bed recurrence. A total of 157 Pheo/PGL patients (44 malignant, 113 benign) with mean follow-up of 87 months were included. Compared with patients with benign Pheo/PGL, patients with malignant Pheo/PGL were younger (median 42 vs 50 years, p = 0.014), had larger tumors (median 6.5 vs 4 cm, p < 0.001) and had PGL (63.6 vs 4.4%, p < 0.001). Genetic testing was performed in 60 patients and was positive in 38 (63%). Although positive genetic results were equally likely in malignant vs benign Pheo/PGL (76 vs 54%, p = 0.1), all 11 patients with germline SDHB mutations had malignant disease. In multivariable analysis, younger age, larger tumor size, and PGL were associated with malignancy (p < 0.05). Pheo patients with negative genetic testing and negative family history who developed metachronous metastases all had primary tumors ≥4 cm in size. Patients who are young, have larger tumors, positive genetic testing (especially SDHB) or have PGL require long-term follow-up. Patients with negative genetic testing or family history and Pheo <4 cm have a lower risk of malignancy, and de-escalated long-term surveillance may be appropriate follow-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 16 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,946,679
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#813
of 6,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,533
of 315,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#21
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.