| Title |
Two‐stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of Failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-2030-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. M. Javad Mortazavi, David Vegari, Anthony Ho, Benjamin Zmistowski, Javad Parvizi |
| Abstract |
In North America, a two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the preferred surgical treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, there are no proper indicators that can guide orthopaedic surgeons in patient selection for two-stage exchange or the appropriate conditions in which to reimplant. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 45 | 23% |
| Unknown | 44 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,704,571
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#437
of 7,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,915
of 154,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.