↓ Skip to main content

In Vitro Effects of Cocaine on Tunneling Nanotube Formation and Extracellular Vesicle Release in Glioblastoma Cell Cultures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
In Vitro Effects of Cocaine on Tunneling Nanotube Formation and Extracellular Vesicle Release in Glioblastoma Cell Cultures
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12031-014-0365-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Carone, Susanna Genedani, Giuseppina Leo, Monica Filaferro, Kjell Fuxe, Luigi Francesco Agnati

Abstract

The effects of cocaine (150 nM, 300 nM, and 150 μM) on human glioblastoma cell cultures were studied on tunneling nanotube formation (1-h cocaine treatment) and extracellular vesicle release (1-, 3-, and 8-h cocaine treatment). Cocaine significantly increased the number of tunneling nanotubes only at the lowest concentration used. The release of extracellular vesicles (mainly exosomes) into the medium was stimulated by cocaine at each concentration used with a maximum effect at the highest concentration tested (150 μM). Moreover, cocaine (150 nM) significantly increased the number of vesicles with 61-80 nm diameter while at concentrations of 300 nM and 150 μM, and the smaller vesicles (30-40 nm diameter) were significantly increased with a reduction of the larger vesicles (41-60 nm diameter). A time dependence in the release of extracellular vesicles was observed. In view of the proposed role of these novel intercellular communication modes in the glial-neuronal plasticity, it seems possible that they can participate in the processes leading to cocaine addiction. The molecular target/s involved in these cocaine effects could be specific molecular components of plasma membrane lipid rafts and/or cocaine-induced modifications in cytoplasmic lipid composition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 37%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#1,330
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,266
of 242,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.