↓ Skip to main content

openPDS: Protecting the Privacy of Metadata through SafeAnswers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
59 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
openPDS: Protecting the Privacy of Metadata through SafeAnswers
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0098790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, Erez Shmueli, Samuel S. Wang, Alex Sandy Pentland

Abstract

The rise of smartphones and web services made possible the large-scale collection of personal metadata. Information about individuals' location, phone call logs, or web-searches, is collected and used intensively by organizations and big data researchers. Metadata has however yet to realize its full potential. Privacy and legal concerns, as well as the lack of technical solutions for personal metadata management is preventing metadata from being shared and reconciled under the control of the individual. This lack of access and control is furthermore fueling growing concerns, as it prevents individuals from understanding and managing the risks associated with the collection and use of their data. Our contribution is two-fold: (1) we describe openPDS, a personal metadata management framework that allows individuals to collect, store, and give fine-grained access to their metadata to third parties. It has been implemented in two field studies; (2) we introduce and analyze SafeAnswers, a new and practical way of protecting the privacy of metadata at an individual level. SafeAnswers turns a hard anonymization problem into a more tractable security one. It allows services to ask questions whose answers are calculated against the metadata instead of trying to anonymize individuals' metadata. The dimensionality of the data shared with the services is reduced from high-dimensional metadata to low-dimensional answers that are less likely to be re-identifiable and to contain sensitive information. These answers can then be directly shared individually or in aggregate. openPDS and SafeAnswers provide a new way of dynamically protecting personal metadata, thereby supporting the creation of smart data-driven services and data science research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Australia 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 249 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 20%
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 130 48%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Engineering 20 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#362,842
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,136
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,007
of 243,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#103
of 4,656 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,656 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.