| Title |
Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-017-1489-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debra A. Dunstan, Ned Scott, Anna K. Todd |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 284 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 118 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 12% |
| Psychology | 33 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 130 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#5,004
of 5,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,067
of 325,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#72
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.