Herbaceous layer response to 17years of controlled deer hunting in forested natural areas
So far Altmetric has seen 5 stories from 5 outlets.
EurekAlert!

( Purdue University ) Regulated deer hunts in Indiana state parks have helped restore the health of forests suffering from decad ..

Phys.org

Regulated deer hunts in Indiana state parks have helped restore the health of forests suffering from decades of damage caused by ..

Science Daily

Regulated deer hunts in Indiana state parks have helped restore the health of forests suffering from decades of damage caused by ..

Nature World News

Regulated deer hunts in Indiana state parks have helped restore forests that were damaged over the years due to a rise in white- ..

redOrbit

Purdue University Regulated deer hunts in Indiana state parks have helped restore the health of forests suffering from decades o ..

So far Altmetric has seen 1 blog post.

Regulated deer hunts in Indiana state parks have helped restore the health of forests suffering from decades of damage caused by ..

So far Altmetric has seen 4 tweets from 4 accounts with an upper bound of 14,396 combined followers.

Removing deer gives damaged forests a chance at recovery. See Purdue University study http://t.co/aIb1EJrV8i

Removing deer gives damaged forests a chance at recovery. See Purdue University study http://t.co/aIb1EJrV8i

Removing deer gives damaged forests a chance at recovery. See Purdue University study http://t.co/aIb1EJrV8i

Removing deer gives damaged forests a chance at recovery. See Purdue University study http://t.co/aIb1EJrV8i

Twitter attention
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of tweeters who shared this article. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
# Country As %
1 US 50%
2 AU 25%
Unknown 25%
Tweeter demographics
Type Count As %
Scientists 2 50%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) 1 25%
Members of the public 1 25%
Mendeley readership
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this article. Click here to see the article's page on the Mendeley website.
Reader demographics
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biological Sciences 3 50%
Environmental Sciences 3 50%
Readers by professional status Count As %
Ph.D. Student 3 50%
Senior Lecturer 1 16%
Student (Master) 1 16%
Student (Bachelor) 1 16%
What's this page for?

It pulls together some of the online activity around this article. It is maintained by Altmetric. We collect relevant information from social media sites, blogs, newspapers, magazines and more.

Having one place where you can see all of the comments on or shares of an article makes it easier to see what others think of the work.

To help you put the data in context we've given the article an Altmetric score, which is our measure of the quality & quantity of online attention that it has received. The scoring algorithm is relatively straightforward and takes things like the relative reach of different data sources into account.

Note that the Altmetric score can't tell you anything about the quality of the article though reading through the different tabs might.

Can I be alerted if anybody mentions this paper?

Yes. If you'd like to be alerted when somebody shares or discusses this paper then you can sign up for email alerts.

You can do this for more than one paper. Alerts are sent out once a day if and only if there has been some activity around one of the papers you want to watch.

You've missed a news story, who can I speak to?

If you're waiting for a tweet or blog post to appear then give it a day: we try to pick up mentions as quickly as possible but it can take some time to process all of the information we collect, especially at peak times.

If more than a day has passed then please fill in this form - it will go to our support team who will take a look and update your article details page as soon as possible.

You can also reach out on Twitter to @altmetric.

The Altmetric score is one measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that this article has received. You can read about how Altmetric scores are calculated here.

This article scored 49.28

The context below was calculated when this article was last mentioned on 12th July 2014

Compared to all articles in Biological Conservation
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 articles from this journal. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean score of 6.3 vs the global average of 4.9. This article has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers. It's actually the 9th highest scoring article in this journal that we've seen so far.
In the
99%ile
Ranks
9th
All articles of a similar age
Older articles will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 76,257 tracked articles that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any journal. This article has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
In the
97%ile
Other articles of a similar age in Biological Conservation
We're also able to compare this article to 3 articles from the same journal and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This article has scored higher than all of them.
In the
66%ile
Ranks
1st
All articles
More generally, Altmetric has tracked 2,510,922 articles across all journals so far. Compared to these this article has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all articles ever tracked by Altmetric.
In the
98%ile
Score in context
Is one of the highest ever scores in this journal (ranked #9 of 903)
show more...
Mentioned by
Readers on
0 CiteULike
Track this article