↓ Skip to main content

Quality of Life After Robotic Thyroidectomy by a Gasless Unilateral Axillary Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Quality of Life After Robotic Thyroidectomy by a Gasless Unilateral Axillary Approach
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3879-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang Myeon Song, Yong Bae Ji, Hyang Sook Bang, Chul Won Park, Dong Sun Kim, Kyung Tae

Abstract

Robotic thyroidectomies have been safely performed with early surgical outcomes comparable to conventional cervical thyroidectomies. However, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after robotic thyroidectomy has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare HRQOL of patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy with that of those who received conventional thyroidectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 34 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 28%
Psychology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 38 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,232,430
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,486
of 6,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,358
of 225,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#70
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.