You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An introduction to ‘other effective area‐based conservation measures’ under Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Origin, interpretation and emerging ocean issues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Conservation, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/aqc.2783 |
| Authors |
Dan Laffoley, Nigel Dudley, Harry Jonas, David MacKinnon, Kathy MacKinnon, Marc Hockings, Stephen Woodley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Togo | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,935,930
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Conservation
#204
of 1,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,773
of 323,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Conservation
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.