↓ Skip to main content

The global burden of other musculoskeletal disorders: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The global burden of other musculoskeletal disorders: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, March 2014
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Smith, Damian G Hoy, Marita Cross, Theo Vos, Mohsen Naghavi, Rachelle Buchbinder, Anthony D Woolf, Lyn March

Abstract

To estimate disability from the remainder of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders (categorised as other MSK) not covered by the estimates made specifically for osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), gout, low back pain and neck pain, as part of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 324 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Researcher 31 9%
Other 22 7%
Other 70 21%
Unknown 81 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 103 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,343,786
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1,458
of 7,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,159
of 223,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#41
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.