You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Prototype Operational Earthquake Loss Model for California Based on UCERF3-ETAS – A First Look at Valuation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earthquake Spectra, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1193/011817eqs017m |
| Authors |
Edward Field, Keith Porter, Kevin Milner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 52% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#476,711
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Earthquake Spectra
#7
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,338
of 329,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earthquake Spectra
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them