↓ Skip to main content

A generalized, likelihood-free method for posterior estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
A generalized, likelihood-free method for posterior estimation
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0530-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandon M. Turner, Per B. Sederberg

Abstract

Recent advancements in Bayesian modeling have allowed for likelihood-free posterior estimation. Such estimation techniques are crucial to the understanding of simulation-based models, whose likelihood functions may be difficult or even impossible to derive. However, current approaches are limited by their dependence on sufficient statistics and/or tolerance thresholds. In this article, we provide a new approach that requires no summary statistics, error terms, or thresholds and is generalizable to all models in psychology that can be simulated. We use our algorithm to fit a variety of cognitive models with known likelihood functions to ensure the accuracy of our approach. We then apply our method to two real-world examples to illustrate the types of complex problems our method solves. In the first example, we fit an error-correcting criterion model of signal detection, whose criterion dynamically adjusts after every trial. We then fit two models of choice response time to experimental data: the linear ballistic accumulator model, which has a known likelihood, and the leaky competing accumulator model, whose likelihood is intractable. The estimated posterior distributions of the two models allow for direct parameter interpretation and model comparison by means of conventional Bayesian statistics-a feat that was not previously possible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 106 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 36%
Neuroscience 15 13%
Engineering 11 9%
Computer Science 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 24 20%