You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Apples to apples or apples to oranges? International variation in reporting of process and outcome of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Resuscitation, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chika Nishiyama, Siobhan P. Brown, Susanne May, Taku Iwami, Rudolph W. Koster, Stefanie G. Beesems, Markku Kuisma, Ari Salo, Ian Jacobs, Judith Finn, Fritz Sterz, Alexander Nürnberger, Karen Smith, Laurie Morrison, Theresa M. Olasveengen, Clifton W. Callaway, Sang Do Shin, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Mohamud Daya, Matthew Huei-Ming, Johan Herlitz, Anneli Strömsöe, Tom P. Aufderheide, Siobhán Masterson, Henry Wang, Jim Christenson, Ian Stiell, Dan Davis, Ella Huszti, Graham Nichol |
| Abstract |
Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies between communities, due in part to variation in the methods of measurement. The Utstein template was disseminated to standardize comparisons of risk factors, quality of care, and outcomes in patients with OHCA. We sought to assess whether OHCA registries are able to collate common data using the Utstein template. A subsequent study will assess whether the Utstein factors explain differences in survival between emergency medical services (EMS) systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 27% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#4,331
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,166
of 244,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#54
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.