↓ Skip to main content

Effects of β-alanine supplementation and high-intensity interval training on endurance performance and body composition in men; a double-blind trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
66 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
video
15 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
Title
Effects of β-alanine supplementation and high-intensity interval training on endurance performance and body composition in men; a double-blind trial
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-6-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abbie E Smith, Ashley A Walter, Jennifer L Graef, Kristina L Kendall, Jordan R Moon, Christopher M Lockwood, David H Fukuda, Travis W Beck, Joel T Cramer, Jeffrey R Stout

Abstract

Intermittent bouts of high-intensity exercise result in diminished stores of energy substrates, followed by an accumulation of metabolites, promoting chronic physiological adaptations. In addition, beta-alanine has been accepted has an effective physiological hydrogen ion (H+) buffer. Concurrent high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and beta-alanine supplementation may result in greater adaptations than HIIT alone. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effects of combining beta-alanine supplementation with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on endurance performance and aerobic metabolism in recreationally active college-aged men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 306 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 24%
Student > Bachelor 66 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Researcher 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 53 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 117 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 60 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#388,335
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#124
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,459
of 448,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#122
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.