↓ Skip to main content

The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning
Published in
Memory & Cognition, March 2000
DOI 10.3758/bf03213804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca L. Gomez, Louann Gerken, Roger W. Schvaneveldt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 40%
Linguistics 14 15%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,571,001
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#1,373
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,824
of 40,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.