↓ Skip to main content

IDH mutation status trumps the Pignatti risk score as a prognostic marker in low-grade gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
IDH mutation status trumps the Pignatti risk score as a prognostic marker in low-grade gliomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11060-017-2570-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olatz Etxaniz, Cristina Carrato, Itziar de Aguirre, Cristina Queralt, Ana Muñoz, José L. Ramirez, Rafael Rosell, Salvador Villà, Rocio Diaz, Ana Estival, Pilar Teixidor, Alberto Indacochea, Sara Ahjal, Laia Vilà, Carme Balañá

Abstract

Management of low-grade gliomas (LGG) is based on clinical and radiologic features, including the Pignatti prognostic scoring system, which classifies patients as low- or high-risk. To determine whether molecular data can offer advantages over these features, we have examined the prognostic impact of several molecular alterations in LGG. In a cohort of 58 patients with LGG, we have retrospectively analyzed clinical and molecular characteristics, including the Pignatti criteria, IDH mutations, TP53 mutations, the 1p/19q deletion, and MGMT methylation, and correlated our findings with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Mean age of patients was 45 years; 71% were classified as low-risk by the Pignatti system. IDH mutations were detected in 62%, p53 mutations in 17%, the 1p/19q codeletion in 46%, and MGMT methylation in 40% of patients. Survival analyses were performed in the 49 patients without contrast enhancement. In the univariate analysis, IDH mutations, the 1p/19q codeletion, and the combination of IDH mutations with the 1p/19q codeletion were associated with both longer PFS (P = 0.006, P = 0.037, and P = 0.003, respectively) and longer OS (P < 0.001, P = 0.02, and P < 0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis identified absence of IDH mutations as a factor for greater risk of progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.1; P = 0.007]and death (HR = 6.4; P < 0.001). We suggest that IDH mutations may be more effective than the Pignatti score in discriminating low- and high-risk patients with LGG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,914,959
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,146
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,359
of 315,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#28
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.