You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ABCA Transporter Gene Expression and Poor Outcome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/dju149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen L. Hedditch, Bo Gao, Amanda J. Russell, Yi Lu, Catherine Emmanuel, Jonathan Beesley, Sharon E. Johnatty, Xiaoqing Chen, Paul Harnett, Joshy George, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Rebekka T. Williams, Claudia Flemming, Diether Lambrechts, Evelyn Despierre, Sandrina Lambrechts, Ignace Vergote, Beth Karlan, Jenny Lester, Sandra Orsulic, Christine Walsh, Peter Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Arif B. Ekici, Alexander Hein, Keitaro Matsuo, Satoyo Hosono, Toru Nakanishi, Yasushi Yatabe, Tanja Pejovic, Yukie Bean, Florian Heitz, Philipp Harter, Andreas du Bois, Ira Schwaab, Estrid Hogdall, Susan K. Kjaer, Allan Jensen, Claus Hogdall, Lene Lundvall, Svend Aage Engelholm, Bob Brown, James Flanagan, Michelle D Metcalf, Nadeem Siddiqui, Thomas Sellers, Brooke Fridley, Julie Cunningham, Joellen Schildkraut, Ed Iversen, Rachel P. Weber, Andrew Berchuck, Ellen Goode, David D. Bowtell, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Anna deFazio, Murray D. Norris, Stuart MacGregor, Michelle Haber, Michelle J. Henderson |
| Abstract |
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters play various roles in cancer biology and drug resistance, but their association with outcomes in serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,385,719
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#3,620
of 7,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,042
of 244,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#50
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.