↓ Skip to main content

Perillyl alcohol protects human renal tubular epithelial cells from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury via inhibition of ROS, endoplasmic reticulum stress and activation of PI3K/Akt/eNOS pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perillyl alcohol protects human renal tubular epithelial cells from hypoxia/reoxygenation injury via inhibition of ROS, endoplasmic reticulum stress and activation of PI3K/Akt/eNOS pathway
Published in
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yixiao Xu, Wantie Wang, Keke Jin, Qifan Zhu, Hongzhou Lin, Minye Xie, Dexuan Wang

Abstract

Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury plays an essential role in renal transplantation, and represents a crucial risk factor for allograft dysfunction and acute renal failure. Modulation of oxidative stress is an effective therapeutic strategy for I/R injury. Perillyl alcohol (POH), a dietary monoterpene with antioxidant activity is found in a variety of plants. The study was carried out to investigate whether treatment of POH could reduce hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced injury. H/R induced significant injury in HK-2 cells. H/R caused an increase in ROS level, apoptosis and ER stress. Meanwhile H/R also inhibited the cell viability and PI3K/Akt/eNOS signaling pathway. Pretreatment with POH prior to H/R improved cell viability, reduce ROS level, ER stress and apoptosis. Moreover, POH could also activate the PI3K/Akt/eNOS pathway. Therefore, POH may possess protective effects in H/R-induced cellular damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
#4,835
of 6,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,899
of 323,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
#137
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.