↓ Skip to main content

The Italian master Leonardo da Vinci and his early understanding of the brachial plexus

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The Italian master Leonardo da Vinci and his early understanding of the brachial plexus
Published in
Child's Nervous System, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00381-017-3581-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chidinma Nwaogbe, Anthony V. D’Antoni, Rod J. Oskouian, R. Shane Tubbs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,571,001
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,447
of 2,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,036
of 315,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#53
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,797 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.