↓ Skip to main content

Residents and Environmental Conservation of the Upo Wetlands Ramsar Site, Republic of Korea

Overview of attention for article published in E-journal GEO, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Residents and Environmental Conservation of the Upo Wetlands Ramsar Site, Republic of Korea
Published in
E-journal GEO, January 2013
DOI 10.4157/ejgeo.8.223
Authors

Toshihisa Asano, Doo-chul Kim, Yukihiro Hirai, Yuichi Kagawa, Tatsuya Ito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,361,993
of 25,071,270 outputs
Outputs from E-journal GEO
#143
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,115
of 293,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from E-journal GEO
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,071,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.