↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Soil Amendments on Microbial Resilience Capacity of Acid Soil Under Copper Stress

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Soil Amendments on Microbial Resilience Capacity of Acid Soil Under Copper Stress
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00128-017-2173-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vassanda Coumar Mounissamy, Samaresh Kundu, Rajendiran Selladurai, Jayanta Kumar Saha, Ashish Kumar Biswas, Tapan Adhikari, Ashok Kumar Patra

Abstract

An incubation study was undertaken to study microbial resilience capacity of acid soil amended with farmyard manure (FYM), charcoal and lime under copper (Cu) perturbation. Copper stress significantly reduced enzymatic activities and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in soil. Percent reduction in microbial activity of soil due to Cu stress was 74.7% in dehydrogenase activity, 59.9% in MBC, 48.2% in alkaline phosphatase activity and 15.1% in acid phosphatase activity. Soil treated with FYM + charcoal showed highest resistance index for enzymatic activities and MBC. Similarly, the highest resilience index for acid phosphatase activity was observed in soil amended with FYM (0.40), whereas FYM + charcoal-treated soil showed the highest resilience indices for alkaline, dehydrogenase activity and MBC: 0.50, 0.22 and 0.25, respectively. This investigation showed that FYM and charcoal application, either alone or in combination, proved to be better than lime with respect to microbial functional resistance and resilience of acid soil under Cu perturbation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,406,932
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#249
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,055
of 319,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.