↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
16 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1354 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
713 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Gabizon, Hilary Shmeeda, Yechezkel Barenholz

Abstract

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection; Doxil or Caelyx) is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, reducing uptake by the reticulo-endothelial system due to the attachment of polyethylene glycol polymers to a lipid anchor and stably retaining drug as a result of liposomal entrapment via an ammonium sulfate chemical gradient. These features result in a pharmacokinetic profile characterised by an extended circulation time and a reduced volume of distribution, thereby promoting tumour uptake. Preclinical studies demonstrated one- or two-phase plasma concentration-time profiles. Most of the drug is cleared with an elimination half-life of 20-30 hours. The volume of distribution is close to the blood volume, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is increased at least 60-fold compared with free doxorubicin. Studies of tissue distribution indicated preferential accumulation into various implanted tumours and human tumour xenografts, with an enhancement of drug concentrations in the tumour when compared with free drug. Clinical studies of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in humans have included patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (ARKS) and with a variety of solid tumours, including ovarian, breast and prostate carcinomas. The pharmacokinetic profile in humans at doses between 10 and 80 mg/m(2) is similar to that in animals, with one or two distribution phases: an initial phase with a half-life of 1-3 hours and a second phase with a half-life of 30-90 hours. The AUC after a dose of 50 mg/m(2) is approximately 300-fold greater than that with free drug. Clearance and volume of distribution are drastically reduced (at least 250-fold and 60-fold, respectively). Preliminary observations indicate that utilising the distinct pharmacokinetic parameters of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in dose scheduling is an attractive possibility. In agreement with the preclinical findings, the ability of pegylated liposomes to extravasate through the leaky vasculature of tumours, as well as their extended circulation time, results in enhanced delivery of liposomal drug and/or radiotracers to the tumour site in cancer patients. There is evidence of selective tumour uptake in malignant effusions, ARKS skin lesions and a variety of solid tumours. The toxicity profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is characterised by dose-limiting mucosal and cutaneous toxicities, mild myelosuppression, decreased cardiotoxicity compared with free doxorubicin and minimal alopecia. The mucocutaneous toxicities are dose-limiting per injection; however, the reduced cardiotoxicity allows a larger cumulative dose than that acceptable for free doxorubicin. Thus, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin represents a new class of chemotherapy delivery system that may significantly improve the therapeutic index of doxorubicin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 713 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 691 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 24%
Researcher 100 14%
Student > Master 83 12%
Student > Bachelor 65 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 4%
Other 108 15%
Unknown 153 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 101 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 12%
Chemistry 81 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 78 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 7%
Other 126 18%
Unknown 192 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,596,005
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#99
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,865
of 195,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#37
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.