↓ Skip to main content

A CASE OF A HUGE UMBILICAL STONE WITH DIFFICULTY IN REMOVAL

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A CASE OF A HUGE UMBILICAL STONE WITH DIFFICULTY IN REMOVAL
Published in
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2003
DOI 10.3919/jjsa.64.1511
Authors

Tsukasa IHARA, Hidetsugu MURAKAMI, Koji KADOWAKI, Eiji TANAKA, Masayuki OKABE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#88
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,891
of 136,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.