↓ Skip to main content

Activity‐permissive workstations: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activity‐permissive workstations: a review
Published in
Obesity Reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1111/obr.12201
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Neuhaus, E. G. Eakin, L. Straker, N. Owen, D. W. Dunstan, N. Reid, G. N. Healy

Abstract

Excessive sedentary time is detrimentally linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and premature mortality. Studies have been investigating the use of activity-permissive workstations to reduce sedentary time in office workers, a highly sedentary target group. This review systematically summarizes the evidence for activity-permissive workstations on sedentary time, health-risk biomarkers, work performance and feasibility indicators in office workplaces. In July 2013, a literature search identified 38 relevant peer-reviewed publications. Key findings were independently extracted by two researchers. The average intervention effect on sedentary time was calculated via meta-analysis. In total, 984 participants across 19 field-based trials and 19 laboratory investigations were included, with sample sizes ranging from n = 2 to 66 per study. Sedentary time, health-risk biomarkers and work performance indicators were reported in 13, 23 and 23 studies, respectively. The pooled effect size from the meta-analysis was -77 min of sedentary time/8-h workday (95% confidence interval = -120, -35 min). Non-significant changes were reported for most health- and work-related outcomes. Studies with acceptability measures reported predominantly positive feedback. Findings suggest that activity-permissive workstations can be effective to reduce occupational sedentary time, without compromising work performance. Larger and longer-term randomized-controlled trials are needed to understand the sustainability of the sedentary time reductions and their longer-term impacts on health- and work-related outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 414 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 18%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 72 17%
Unknown 75 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 16%
Sports and Recreations 64 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 12%
Psychology 28 7%
Social Sciences 25 6%
Other 92 22%
Unknown 98 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#399,761
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Reviews
#157
of 2,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,394
of 242,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Reviews
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.