| Title |
The walking dead: Blender as a tool for paleontologists with a case study on extinct arachnids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Paleontology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1666/13-088 |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#251,907
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleontology
#14
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,280
of 280,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleontology
#1
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.