↓ Skip to main content

Interrelatedness between C-reactive protein and oxidized low-density lipoprotein

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interrelatedness between C-reactive protein and oxidized low-density lipoprotein
Published in
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1515/cclm-2014-0590
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milan M. Obradovic, Andreja Trpkovic, Vladan Bajic, Sanja Soskic, Aleksandra Jovanovic, Julijana Stanimirovic, Milos Panic, Esma R. Isenovic

Abstract

Abstract C-reactive protein (CRP) is a marker of inflammation. Atherosclerosis is now recognized as inflammatory disease, and it seems that CRP directly contributes to atherogenesis. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) molecule increases the uptake of lipid products by macrophages leading to cholesterol accumulation and subsequent foam cell formation. The elevated levels of high sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) and oxidized LDL (OxLDL) in the blood were found to be associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In this review, we highlighted the evidence that CRP and OxLDL are involved in interrelated (patho) physiological pathways. The findings on association between hsCRP and OxLDL in the clinical setting will be also summarized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#1,107
of 2,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,157
of 240,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.