↓ Skip to main content

Water in Extrasolar Planets and Implications for Habitability

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Water in Extrasolar Planets and Implications for Habitability
Published in
Space Science Reviews, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11214-017-0413-1
Authors

Lena Noack, Ignas Snellen, Heike Rauer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 18 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,571,001
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#961
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,024
of 315,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.