You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
殿部筋肉内注射部位における中殿筋表層血管および神経損傷の危険性の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.18892/jsnas.8.2_91 |
| Authors |
佐藤 好恵, 藤井 徹也, 佐伯 香織, 新實 夕香理, 篠田 貢一, 小澤 由紀, 中野 隆 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,517,788
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science
#2
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,043
of 125,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them