Title |
Thymol derivatives from hairy roots of Arnica montana
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Cell Reports, April 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00299-006-0157-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
I. Weremczuk-Jeżyna, W. Kisiel, H. Wysokińska |
Abstract |
Five known thymol derivatives were isolated from roots of Arnica montana transformed with Agrobacterium rhizogenes LBA 9402. The compounds were characterized by spectral methods. The pattern of thymol derivatives in light-grown hairy roots was slightly different from that in dark-grown ones. This is the first report on the presence of thymol derivatives in hairy roots of the plant. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Serbia | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Professor | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 59% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,271,317
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#68
of 2,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,394
of 66,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.