| Title |
The sun-hurricane connection: Diagnosing the solar impacts on hurricane frequency over the North Atlantic basin using a space–time model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-014-1120-9 |
| Authors |
Robert E. Hodges, Thomas H. Jagger, James B. Elsner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 9% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,357,006
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#193
of 1,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,563
of 224,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.