↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound and EMG–NCV study (electromyography and nerve conduction velocity) correlation in diagnosis of nerve pathologies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ultrasound, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound and EMG–NCV study (electromyography and nerve conduction velocity) correlation in diagnosis of nerve pathologies
Published in
Journal of Ultrasound, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40477-016-0232-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shilpa Domkundwar, Gayatri Autkar, S. V. Khadilkar, Mayur Virarkar

Abstract

Nerve disorders are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Ultrasonography (USG) is a useful modality in the evaluation of most of the peripheral and superficial pathologies amenable to penetration by ultrasound. The primary objective is to study the USG findings of various peripheral nerve pathologies and to correlate them with electrophysiological (EMG-NCV) findings. 42 patients referred with suspicion of peripheral nervous system affection were evaluated with USG along with EMG-NCV. After reviewing detailed anatomy of the region, the affected nerve was visualized along the major neurovascular bundle or at a known anatomical landmark with a high-frequency (9-20 MHz) linear/hockey stick transducer. The USG parameters, namely loss of fibrillary pattern, hypoechogenicity and nerve thickening, showed significant p value (p < 0.05) on the tests of significance, suggesting these parameters are significant predictors of nerve affection/pathology on USG. Each ultrasound parameter was correlated individually with SNAP and CMAP. The results revealed positive correlation of echogenicity (r = 0.210, p = 0.05), fibrillary pattern (r = 0.209, p = 0.05) and thickening (r = 0.387, p < 0.05) with sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP). USG can be used as corroborative investigation to strengthen the findings of EMG-NCV. This combination represents a powerful tool in enabling appropriate planning for treatment, preventing unnecessary intervention and thus improving overall outcomes in patients with peripheral neuropathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 25 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ultrasound
#253
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,510
of 421,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ultrasound
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.