You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of long repeat expansions from PCR-free whole-genome sequence data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Research, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1101/gr.225672.117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Egor Dolzhenko, Joke J.F.A. van Vugt, Richard J. Shaw, Mitchell A. Bekritsky, Marka van Blitterswijk, Giuseppe Narzisi, Subramanian S. Ajay, Vani Rajan, Bryan R. Lajoie, Nathan H. Johnson, Zoya Kingsbury, Sean J. Humphray, Raymond D. Schellevis, William J. Brands, Matt Baker, Rosa Rademakers, Maarten Kooyman, Gijs H.P. Tazelaar, Michael A. van Es, Russell McLaughlin, William Sproviero, Aleksey Shatunov, Ashley Jones, Ahmad Al Khleifat, Alan Pittman, Sarah Morgan, Orla Hardiman, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Chris Shaw, Bradley Smith, Edmund J. Neo, Karen Morrison, Pamela J. Shaw, Catherine Reeves, Lara Winterkorn, Nancy S. Wexler, The US–Venezuela Collaborative Research Group, David E. Housman, Christopher W. Ng, Alina L. Li, Ryan J. Taft, Leonard H. van den Berg, David R. Bentley, Jan H. Veldink, Michael A. Eberle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Norway | 2 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 26 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 20 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 361 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 101 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 118 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 111 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#736,928
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#236
of 4,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,070
of 327,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.