↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Role of Long Non-Coding RNA SOX2OT in SOX2 Regulation in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emerging Role of Long Non-Coding RNA SOX2OT in SOX2 Regulation in Breast Cancer
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjan E. Askarian-Amiri, Vahid Seyfoddin, Chanel E. Smart, Jingli Wang, Ji Eun Kim, Herah Hansji, Bruce C. Baguley, Graeme J. Finlay, Euphemia Y. Leung

Abstract

The transcription factor SOX2 is essential for maintaining pluripotency in a variety of stem cells. It has important functions during embryonic development, is involved in cancer stem cell maintenance, and is often deregulated in cancer. The mechanism of SOX2 regulation has yet to be clarified, but the SOX2 gene lies in an intron of a long multi-exon non-coding RNA called SOX2 overlapping transcript (SOX2OT). Here, we show that the expression of SOX2 and SOX2OT is concordant in breast cancer, differentially expressed in estrogen receptor positive and negative breast cancer samples and that both are up-regulated in suspension culture conditions that favor growth of stem cell phenotypes. Importantly, ectopic expression of SOX2OT led to an almost 20-fold increase in SOX2 expression, together with a reduced proliferation and increased breast cancer cell anchorage-independent growth. We propose that SOX2OT plays a key role in the induction and/or maintenance of SOX2 expression in breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,478
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,437
of 194,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,349
of 225,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,779
of 4,624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.