You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A framework for evaluating the influence of climate, dispersal limitation, and biotic interactions using fossil pollen associations across the late Quaternary
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecography, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/ecog.00779 |
Authors |
Jessica L. Blois, Nicholas J. Gotelli, Anna K. Behrensmeyer, J. Tyler Faith, S. Kathleen Lyons, John W. Williams, Kathryn L. Amatangelo, Antoine Bercovici, Andrew Du, Jussi T. Eronen, Gary R. Graves, Nathan Jud, Conrad Labandeira, Cindy V. Looy, Brian McGill, David Patterson, Richard Potts, Brett Riddle, Rebecca Terry, Anikó Tóth, Amelia Villaseñor, Scott Wing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 35% |
Spain | 2 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Scientists | 7 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 1% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 228 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 28% |
Researcher | 58 | 23% |
Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 66 | 26% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Unknown | 42 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,079,762
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#639
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,159
of 245,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.