↓ Skip to main content

Gravitational Lensing in Astronomy

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Gravitational Lensing in Astronomy
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, December 1998
DOI 10.12942/lrr-1998-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joachim Wambsganss

Abstract

Deflection of light by gravity was predicted by General Relativity and observationally confirmed in 1919. In the following decades, various aspects of the gravitational lens effect were explored theoretically. Among them were: the possibility of multiple or ring-like images of background sources, the use of lensing as a gravitational telescope on very faint and distant objects, and the possibility of determining Hubble's constant with lensing. It is only relatively recently, (after the discovery of the first doubly imaged quasar in 1979), that gravitational lensing has became an observational science. Today lensing is a booming part of astrophysics. In addition to multiply-imaged quasars, a number of other aspects of lensing have been discovered: For example, giant luminous arcs, quasar microlensing, Einstein rings, galactic microlensing events, arclets, and weak gravitational lensing. At present, literally hundreds of individual gravitational lens phenomena are known. Although still in its childhood, lensing has established itself as a very useful astrophysical tool with some remarkable successes. It has contributed significant new results in areas as different as the cosmological distance scale, the large scale matter distribution in the universe, mass and mass distribution of galaxy clusters, the physics of quasars, dark matter in galaxy halos, and galaxy structure. Looking at these successes in the recent past we predict an even more luminous future for gravitational lensing. Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.12942/lrr-1998-12.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 105 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor 5 4%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 78 70%
Engineering 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,399,791
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#88
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,160
of 110,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.