↓ Skip to main content

Genome Wide Association Identifies Common Variants at the SERPINA6/SERPINA1 Locus Influencing Plasma Cortisol and Corticosteroid Binding Globulin

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome Wide Association Identifies Common Variants at the SERPINA6/SERPINA1 Locus Influencing Plasma Cortisol and Corticosteroid Binding Globulin
Published in
PLoS Genetics, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Bolton, Caroline Hayward, Nese Direk, John G. Lewis, Geoffrey L. Hammond, Lesley A. Hill, Anna Anderson, Jennifer Huffman, James F. Wilson, Harry Campbell, Igor Rudan, Alan Wright, Nicholas Hastie, Sarah H. Wild, Fleur P. Velders, Albert Hofman, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Jari Lahti, Katri Räikkönen, Eero Kajantie, Elisabeth Widen, Aarno Palotie, Johan G. Eriksson, Marika Kaakinen, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Nicholas J. Timpson, George Davey Smith, Susan M. Ring, David M. Evans, Beate St Pourcain, Toshiko Tanaka, Yuri Milaneschi, Stefania Bandinelli, Luigi Ferrucci, Pim van der Harst, Judith G. M. Rosmalen, Stephen J. L. Bakker, Niek Verweij, Robin P. F. Dullaart, Anubha Mahajan, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Andrew Morris, Lars Lind, Erik Ingelsson, Laura N. Anderson, Craig E. Pennell, Stephen J. Lye, Stephen G. Matthews, Joel Eriksson, Dan Mellstrom, Claes Ohlsson, Jackie F. Price, Mark W. J. Strachan, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Henning Tiemeier, Brian R. Walker

Abstract

Variation in plasma levels of cortisol, an essential hormone in the stress response, is associated in population-based studies with cardio-metabolic, inflammatory and neuro-cognitive traits and diseases. Heritability of plasma cortisol is estimated at 30-60% but no common genetic contribution has been identified. The CORtisol NETwork (CORNET) consortium undertook genome wide association meta-analysis for plasma cortisol in 12,597 Caucasian participants, replicated in 2,795 participants. The results indicate that <1% of variance in plasma cortisol is accounted for by genetic variation in a single region of chromosome 14. This locus spans SERPINA6, encoding corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG, the major cortisol-binding protein in plasma), and SERPINA1, encoding α1-antitrypsin (which inhibits cleavage of the reactive centre loop that releases cortisol from CBG). Three partially independent signals were identified within the region, represented by common SNPs; detailed biochemical investigation in a nested sub-cohort showed all these SNPs were associated with variation in total cortisol binding activity in plasma, but some variants influenced total CBG concentrations while the top hit (rs12589136) influenced the immunoreactivity of the reactive centre loop of CBG. Exome chip and 1000 Genomes imputation analysis of this locus in the CROATIA-Korcula cohort identified missense mutations in SERPINA6 and SERPINA1 that did not account for the effects of common variants. These findings reveal a novel common genetic source of variation in binding of cortisol by CBG, and reinforce the key role of CBG in determining plasma cortisol levels. In turn this genetic variation may contribute to cortisol-associated degenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Master 16 9%
Professor 12 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Psychology 13 8%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,997,001
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#5,073
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,513
of 244,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#87
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.