| Title |
Peritoneal Dialysis and In-Centre Haemodialysis: A Cost-Utility Analysis from a UK Payer Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-014-0108-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catrin Treharne, Frank Xiaoqing Liu, Murat Arici, Lydia Crowe, Usman Farooqui |
| Abstract |
With limited healthcare resources available, cost-effective provision of dialysis to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is important. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 38% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,190,798
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#83
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,094
of 227,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.