↓ Skip to main content

Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
580 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1452 Mendeley
Title
Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mischa Willis-Shattuck, Posy Bidwell, Steve Thomas, Laura Wyness, Duane Blaauw, Prudence Ditlopo

Abstract

A key constraint to achieving the MDGs is the absence of a properly trained and motivated workforce. Loss of clinical staff from low and middle-income countries is crippling already fragile health care systems. Health worker retention is critical for health system performance and a key problem is how best to motivate and retain health workers. The authors undertook a systematic review to consolidate existing evidence on the impact of financial and non-financial incentives on motivation and retention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
South Africa 6 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Ghana 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 17 1%
Unknown 1402 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 374 26%
Researcher 156 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 9%
Student > Postgraduate 110 8%
Student > Bachelor 110 8%
Other 280 19%
Unknown 292 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 371 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 194 13%
Social Sciences 187 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 115 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 44 3%
Other 198 14%
Unknown 343 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#722,312
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#147
of 8,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,236
of 181,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.