↓ Skip to main content

Brand switching or reduced consumption? A study of how cigarette taxes affect tobacco consumption

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Brand switching or reduced consumption? A study of how cigarette taxes affect tobacco consumption
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10198-013-0549-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiang-Ming Chen, Kuo-Liang Chang, Lin Lin, Jwo-Leun Lee

Abstract

We examined the influence of cigarette taxes on tobacco consumption, with an emphasis on smokers' choice between reducing cigarette consumption and switching brands. We constructed three scenario-based models to study the following two subjects: (1) the relationship between deciding whether to reduce one's cigarette consumption and to practice brand switching (simultaneous or sequential); (2) the key determinants that affect smokers' decisions in terms of their consumption and brand switching when facing higher taxes. We applied data collected from a survey in Taiwan, and the results indicated that both independent and two-stage decision-making models generated very similar conclusions. We also found that gender difference contributed to reduce cigarette consumption. In addition, this study indicated that high-income smokers were less likely to switch brands, whereas well-educated smokers were more likely to switch brands. Most importantly, we questioned the effectiveness of cigarette tax policy, as our results suggested that higher price did not necessarily reduce consumption. Indeed, data indicated that <24 % of smokers actually reduced their cigarette consumption after the tax on cigarettes increased.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 34%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#1,211
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,937
of 320,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.