↓ Skip to main content

Use of GIS Technology in the Prediction and Monitoring of Landslide Hazard

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
Use of GIS Technology in the Prediction and Monitoring of Landslide Hazard
Published in
Natural Hazards, November 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1008097111310
Authors

A. Carrara, F. Guzzetti, M. Cardinali, P. Reichenbach

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 364 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Researcher 56 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 82 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 121 32%
Environmental Science 51 13%
Engineering 45 12%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 97 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,502
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,376
of 36,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.